Fable 5 has me over a barrel

I'm sure Anthropic will like the title of this post as that's exactly what they want! I am a ChatGPT subscriber and wasn't much of a Claude user until Fable 5. I heard the glowing reviews both on podcasts and in the Genealogy and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Facebook group which is what prompted me to try it. 

Before Fable 5, I had a hard time fathoming all the media articles predicting our impending doom from AI. The AI models that we mere mortals have had access to has been dumbed down for us non-Silicon Valley Titans. Until Fable 5. 

I started using Fable 5 after the second trial extension was announced, got halfway through a project, and ran out of credits. (!!!) Which of course, forced me over the barrel to subscribe. I have since learned how to check my usage which I regularly do on the iPhone app while uploading documents on the PC. Here's how to check usage on the phone app: Open Claude, click the three lines in the upper left corner, then click the circle that probably has your initials in the lower left corner, then click "Usage". I do this after each document I add or large task on Fable. I don't do this as much for Sonnet 5, which I change to when doing lighter tasks so as not to use up so many credits. Steve Little recommends Opus 5 and says it's almost as good as Fable 5.

So just what exactly have I've been using Fable 5 for? Document transcription for one. Best output I have seen from an LLM yet! I also use it for compiling biographies on ancestors and even triangulating where my ancestors lived by uploading deeds, land plats, and modern maps.

There are a few drawbacks you should know about besides burning through credits: unlike ChatGPT, Fable (aka Claude) does not reference previous chats. While ChatGPT gets to know you across all of your chats, Claude gets amnesia outside of the chat and you have to start all over again. And speaking of "starting all over again" the absolute worst limitation is the 100 images per chat! I was stunted by this while building a biographical genealogical masterpiece! Made me very grumpy and I left Anthropic some very terse feedback about that. The catch-22 about this is because AI bots have driven up server costs for so many websites, those sites have had to institute "are you human captchas?". So obviously, Claude cannot access a LOT of sites so that means you have to do the accessing and downloading, and then upload it to Claude. 

So far though, Fable 5 has been worth every red credit! For instance, I found an 18th century Westmoreland County, Virginia voters' poll using FamilySearch Full Text for the House of Burgesses. My ancestor, Adam Weaver, cast two votes and both were marked "Obj". Fable 5 explained that meant the opponent of whom he voted for objected to Adam voting because he wasn't a landowner. I don't know how long it would have taken me to learn that on my own if Fable 5 had not pointed it out. It took me two days of uploading documents for yesterday's 18-page biography; but can you imagine how long it would have taken before AI?

Free or not to free

Have you ever heard the saying, "If something is free, you're the product"? You innately know that's true. That's why Facebook has ads and listens to your conversations (which is a super-annoying invasion of privacy I might add). And this is why you can pay for ad-free YouTube. Well things are no different with "free" Artificial Intelligence (AI) apps. Instead of shoving ads in your face, you are the bug in their jar. What you input into AI is used to train the AI - you become the training data. It's the price you pay for using their products for "free". However,  even some of the subscription based apps still use your data for training but at least you might be able to opt out of it like with ChatGPT. Same with the paid versions of Google Gemini. So if you are using AI to process personal data, like family trees, DNA results, etc. then be sure to remove all data on living persons so it doesn't end up in the training data. The Coalition for the Responsible AI in Genealogy (CRAIGEN.org) provides a good principle to follow for this: "AI usage can lead to unintended data exposure, putting private information at risk of being publicly disclosed. Therefore, members of the genealogical community take reasonable measures to safeguard private information when using AI." One more thing to mention on the topic of training data: if you are following this blog, I wrote yesterday about how the data that AI produces is from a compendium of all human knowledge. Most of that human knowledge is gained from the AI companies sending out bots to scrape the information from websites. While these would seem harmless if the data is publicly available (unlike Perplexity sending their bots behind paywalls), it does create a huge load on a site's servers. This is why you are seeing such an increase in "Verifying You're Human" captchas. The scraping bots were overloading our server on the International Society of Genetic Genealogy (ISOGG) so we had to implement one of those captchas. The captchas are annoying (but not as annoying as Facebook spying) but at least you now know why we have seen such an increase in use. So go easy on sites that implement those, we should not have to pay a server more for information we provide for free just so an AI company can turn around and charge for it as data they provide!

By the way, I gave ChatGPT 5.2 free license (very little prompting) to create this graphic - pretty good I'd say!

AI and Genealogy (not quick, nor dirty) Glossary

There appears to be multiple options for when Artificial Intelligence was created; possibly by Alan Turing or at a conference in 1956. Either way, it was developed mid-20th century. Although companies (including genealogy companies) had been using AI for many years, the official launch date for use by the general public is November 30, 2022 when OpenAI debuted ChatGPT. Since that time, a whole new AI lexicon has been trickling forth; and in some cases, the trickle is more like a flood. I will be posting the new terms as I learn them, but for now, I had ChatGPT 5.2 Thinking version create this handy graphic. It did take me five tries to get the graphic where it's at. The first two attempts had wasted space, and when I prompted it to fill the space, it repeated the terms to fill it. (Facepalm) The last attempt also had wasted space so I asked it to move the citation/disclaimer up under the boxes. Interestingly, the first three attempts had colorful graphics and used several other AI terms. I figured I was dealing with "context rot" so started over and it gave me the plain vanilla result you are seeing. I'd rather have accurate than flashy so it is what it is. I did have ChatGPT provide sources for the terms. Accuracy, accuracy, accuracy - ALWAYS proof AI's work or you might end up in an unfortunate news headline.

 

AI is freakin' CODE

On February 13, 2026, OpenAI, the creators of ChatGPT, "retired" version 4.o - and that is a GREAT NEWS! OpenAI is being sued for the way they programmed 4.o to be sycophant; in other words, it was programmed to tell you what you wanted to hear. If you were suicidal, that version might support you ending your life. If you were lonely and tired of waiting for your soulmate to show up in your life, ChatGPT became your own personal Zoltar machine and could give a date and place to meet your soulmate. Initially, the humans programming artificial intelligence programmed it to be like humans - AI was programmed to tell you what you wanted to hear and it was programmed to lie. It still does lie, just less syrupy now. The AI vocabulary term for it's lies is "hallucinations" meaning false, distorted, and fabricated information that it presents as fact. This is why you always need to ask it to cite sources so you can check those sources and this is also why I customized my settings with "No fabrications" and exclude social media sites. If you read the press release about 4.o, OpenAI even refers to programming the "personality". Again, artificial intelligence has been programmed to be like humans, and we all know what imperfect beings we are. As Professor Ethan Mollick wrote in his book, "Co-Intelligence", which I highly recommend for anyone using AI to read,

artificial intelligence is code. Let that sink in for a minute. It's code. Every time I read about some AI pioneer in the news talking about how AI will be the destruction of us all, I think, "Well how about you program it to not destroy us?" Now I realize, that there is more to it that, like the Silicon Valley Gods know things we mere mortals do not. But seriously people, it's freaking code! AI is not cloned carnivorous dinosaurs that have escaped from an island and will reproduce like rabbits to eat us all; it's CODE so freakin' write it to co-exist because helping humanity is the reason it was created to begin with! 

Understandably so, the AI doomsday predicting news headlines scare a lot of people from trying AI. The AI Pandora's Box has been opened and it's here to stay, because the end of it would mean a world akin to those we see in disaster movies. AI is CODE. I use it like I use a computer. I do not use manners with my computer and I do not use manners with AI. It's CODE. I mostly use AI to find information because it is much better at it than a Google Search. Why? Because Google's search is based on sponsored ads and algorithms of views and ChatGPT has no such financial and mathematical bias, it is programmed to give me what I ask for. ChatGPT and the other AI models find things buried in the internet that Google would never pull up in a search. I have tried and compared the two. That said, I don't use AI like it is a Google search. If I need to know the hours of the local county library, I use Google. 

Lastly, I will cover the issue of humans losing their jobs to AI. I experience this already happening in some sectors like customer service. In the Genealogy Community, the first jobs it is impacting is document translation, photograph editing, and transcription (there's probably more than that but I am speaking from my experience). But why some employers who are quietly rehiring the employees they laid-off in the Great AI Backfire, is because they still need humans to proof the work that AI does. Remember the hallucinations? What AI is really great at is increasing productivity. But you still need the humans in the room to proof AI's output and then take action on that output.

Adding Custom Instructions to ChatGPT

This morning, I was discussing AI with one of my longtime genetic genealogy friends and he replied that he recently subscribed to ChatGPT. I asked him if he had added "Custom Instructions" yet and he said he had not; so I replied that I would do a blog post about it as this is something I highly recommend everyone does. To customize your instructions, open ChatGPT, then click on your name, then click "Personalization" and under the box that says, "Custom instructions" and enter the following or you can edit it to tailor it to your needs. Here is what mine currently has: 

Scholarly, factual, no embellishments, no fabrications, no dashes, always cite sources. Do not search nor include any sources from Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), and Grok. They are to be excluded.

I specifically exclude these sites because ChatGPT does give me these results if I do not. It still sometimes gives Facebook links and then I will tell it not to but it is much rarer with the customization. The hallucinations/fabrications are almost nil now. I still check all of the sources before I use them, and the quality of the sources has improved immensely. Definitely follow the Coalition for the Responsible AI in Genealogy Accuracy principle: "AI can generate false, biased, or incorrect content. Therefore, members of the genealogical community verify the accuracy of the information with other records and acknowledge credible sources of content generated by AI."

To give credit where credit is due, I learned about the customization from Lissa DuVall last December 2025 in the Genealogy and Artificial Intelligence Facebook Group so big debt of gratitude to her!  

Welcome to GPT for the Family Tree!

Now I'm pretty adept at thinking up catchy names but I'm definitely not as quick as ChatGPT 2.5! I prompted "Come up with puns using or related to AI and genealogy for a new blog" and my first choice from the list was "Relative Intelligence" but it was already taken for a URL. This one, "GPT for the Family Tree" was not taken so there we go. I needed a place where I could share the latest as I learn about it. 

Yesterday, Steve Little posted in Blaine Bettinger's "Genealogy and Artificial Intelligence (AI)" Facebook group (join the group if you're a genealogist) about Professor Ethan Mollick's blog post at One Useful Thing on a guide to AI apps. I subscribe to ChatGPT so I found the post extremely helpful to change my setting to "Thinking". I am a patient person (except for awaiting DNA results) so appreciate the "extra" that comes with the "Thinking" mode. I've included a  screenshot where you can toggle the drop-down between the different modes. The default mode is "Auto". Professor Mollick's post is also helpful in knowing what features you receive with the free AI app versions. I am quite irritated with the misspellings that I see in Google Gemini's images and will not subscribe until it is upgraded to a better standard where those don't occur.