In today's news, the Pompeii Archaeological Park in collaboration with the University of Padua announced an AI "reconstruction" of a Pompeii victim from Mount Vesuvius' AD 79 eruption. While artificial intelligence can be a more cost-effective and quicker way to do facial reconstructions than clay models, it is hoped that prompters will do every possible measure to insure their interpretation from remains is not altered or improved upon by an AI. Processes and tools should be peer-reviewed and published in academic journals. If you find that this particular case has indeed been published in a peer-reviewed journal, please share the link in the comments section below. While genealogists have photos that can be regenerated, photos produced with AI should always be disclosed and labeled. See the Coalition for Responsible AI in Genealogy's photo statement for more information..jpeg)
Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Are we really looking into the eyes of that Pompeii victim?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AI ALERT: Genealogists need to be aware of AI shrinkflation and subsidies
ChatGPT's image of the "rug pull". Picture this: you're working away using an AI agent on a kinship analysis and are sudde...
-
My FamilySearch Stats Several weeks ago, my husband asked me what I was working on. I replied that I was working on my genealogy and his res...
-
As FamilySearch's biggest (self-proclaimed) fan, they have once again created an AI search tool that is a "must try" for ge...
-
Claude Design - Design System slide deck Last August was my first go at using Claude Design to create my presentation for East Coast Geneti...
No comments:
Post a Comment