FamilySearch does it again with "Simple Search"!

 As FamilySearch's biggest (self-proclaimed) fan, they have once again created an AI search tool that is a "must try" for genealogists! I learned about Simple Search from Jennifer Moulder at the 2026 Utah State DAR Conference. I thought I would try it out with searching for a document for my own Chapter Registrar; that she needed for a Prospective Member's application. To use the tool, sign in to your FamilySearch account, or if you do not have one, you need to create one to use the Labs feature. I then located the "Demasters" family that my Registrar needed a document for that tied the father to the son, and as you can see in the image, I just asked it to search for that using their FamilySearch ID numbers. It produced a list of documents within seconds, including one my Registrar could use, and she was quite pleased! Jennifer also mentioned that Simple Search will sometimes produce documents that Full Text misses.

To edit or not to edit? Disclosure is the answer

Salt Palace 2026

In today's news, the prompter and motion capture provider of AI creation, Tilly Norwood, is receiving death threats. An interesting point the prompter makes is that "Tilly is famous. I'm not. That's wonderful. Fame is a horrible thing." Death threats definitely add credence to the "fame is a horrible thing" posit. Norwood's prompter also makes the point that since the AI is the famous one, she doesn't have to do things like Botox to preserve youthfulness. Altering one's appearance was a recent discussion I had with Ilya at The Family Vault (an AI Agent and cloud storage) booth at 2026 RootsTech. Ilya questioned why disclose using AI for photo regeneration when people edit photos with Photoshop or even that many women wear make-up and that's editing their looks? I've been mulling this over ever since RootsTech! In the Genealogy Community, it is actually an asset to be older. When I became active in genealogy at age 31, I actually had genealogists be dismissive towards me due to my youth. Some genealogists wear make-up and some don't; it's not a field where appearance is judged like it is with celebrities. I have noticed that make-up tends to help when on Zoom meetings or on stage because the bright lights tend to wash out facial features. Unlike with AI use, there's no need to disclose I'm wearing make-up because it's quite obvious and visible. Of course I didn't think of this at the time I was chatting with Ilya - the case for disclosure lies with whether editing can be detected or not. Make-up is visible. Tinting old photos is visible. AI photo regeneration is not visible (at least to the naked eye). Read more here on the Coalition for Responsible AI in Genealogy's "Protecting Trust in Historical Images" position statement.

"The Thinking Game" is a must watch for AI and Genetic Genealogy enthusiasts

https://youtu.be/d95J8yzvjbQ?si=mrHOHVrLm41B9Bre
 

The COVID-19 pandemic brought into sharp focus for me how precious time really is. You cannot buy more time no matter how wealthy you are; so at some point, you need to realize this fact and spend the time you have as wisely as you can. One area where I feel strongly about this is with movies and TV. I'm always telling my friends, "You won't be on your death bed saying, "I wish I had watched more news." I especially detest watching movies or shows that I feel were a waste of my time and grey matter. Due to my mind-shift, I struggle to find something worth watching during air travel. On a recent United flight, I was lucky to find "The Thinking Game" in their library. Definitely worth every second of my time to watch! The film centers on the journey of Demis Hassabis, from childhood through to winning the Nobel Prize for creating the AI AlphaFold agent which solved the "protein-folding problem". Not only does the documentary include much of the evolution of artificial intelligence and the issues surrounding it, it also shows how Hassabis had the goal from a young age that AI could be used to solve human issues and ailments. "The Thinking Game" is available to watch on Prime and for free on YouTube.

No copyrighting AI generated art

 On Monday, February 23, 2026, I wrote about artificial intelligence’s impact on human created art and how I think the onslaught of AI art slop will eventually drive people back to human created art. Well…that prediction is

already coming true; on March 1st, a local friend posted on Facebook looking for a graphic artist that did NOT use AI. Another win for human created art occurred today when the Supreme Court rejected a case of man seeking to copyright AI generated art. This rejection upholds a lower court ruling that denied the copyright. AI art will continue to improve and be used en masse, but there’s still value in human created art which will continue to grow. 

The Gamechanger: Using FamilySearch Full Text AI

My FamilySearch Stats

Several weeks ago, my husband asked me what I was working on. I replied that I was working on my genealogy and his response was, "Why? I thought you were done." Now to a genealogist's ears, that's a funny remark because all genealogists know that we will never be completely "done" as there is always something to work on in the family tree. Granted, I did the vast majority of my computer tree research in the early 2000's and then pivoted to DNA research. The only time since that I have conducted traditional genealogy research was when I had the opportunity to do in-person research at archives like the Daughters of the American Revolution Library, the Clayton Library in Houston, and the South Carolina Department of Archives and History, etc. etc. But the reason I now have a laptop in front of me in the quiet hours of early morning and late at night is thanks to FamilySearch.org implementing Full Text AI Search. In 2025 alone, I broke through an Irish ancestor's brickwall that we had thought would never be broken considering the difficulty imposed on research by the Four Courts fire in 1922 and I found another ancestor during his "lost years" in another county. In my mind, FamilySearch Full Text AI is the best thing since sliced bread! So if you're into family tree research, and you have not tried it, you need to and I will tell you how I get good results. But first, I highly recommend you have already connected to a tree in FamilySearch. For most people just starting out, that usually just entails connecting yourself to your parents and sometimes grandparents and the tree is usually already built out. And if you are not familiar with FamilySearch, it is entirely FREE! As you can see on my stats graph on the right, the huge spike in 2025-26 contributions (which is mostly records I have attached) is thanks to Full Text AI. Connecting yourself in a tree makes for ease of navigation, and will connect you to cousins at "Relatives at RootsTech."

To start your first Full Text AI search, log in to FamilySearch.org - then go to the top menu and click "Search" on the upper left menu, then click on "Full Text". When the box comes up, enter your ancestor's name in quotes, e.g.: "Rody Kennedy" then the place they lived "South Carolina" and a year range (I usually make mine a little broader than their birth year and death date). Then submit. Sometimes, especially with a common name, I will add another name related to that ancestor in the "Keyword" box above their name, for example, his wife "Ellen" and that will narrow the results down. Putting the name in quotes works much better than using a plus sign as I have tried both but I learned about the quotes from this video on FamilySearch AI which I highly recommend. This video is not only excellent for learning about this tool, but Colette Hokanson includes great general AI info as well. After you found a document that matches your ancestor, you can download a JPG of it and a PDF with or without a transcription. Be sure to proofread the transcription and correct errors before attaching to your ancestor's profile. I leave or add the words "Generated from AI summary" or "Generated from AI transcription" for disclosure purposes. Sometimes, genealogists like myself have already attached the record and it will show you if it has been attached, but do click and verify who the record was attached to. I recently attached a will of a friend of my ancestor who had named her in his will. You can also correct spelling errors by clicking the little pencil icon at the top right corner of the transcription box.

I have to say, I am deeply grateful to FamilySearch for implementing this AI Search function as it has allowed me to find records that I never would have found in my lifetime otherwise. On my very first trip to the FamilySearch Library in Salt Lake City in May 2023, I wasted an entire day of my life there looking for my Bohemian Great-Grandfather, August Bauman (wife is Josefa Engel) in the microfilms. When I could not find these two needles-in-a-haystack, I resigned myself to waiting for human volunteers to index these records for a kingdom that no longer exists (Bohemia that is). While these European collections have not yet been added to the AI searchable collections, I now have hope they will be and I will find them.

RootsTech 2026 is almost here and one of the exciting things about RootsTech is all the company announcements and new products/features. You can attend RootsTech online for FREE - sign up here and be sure to add lots of great AI sessions to your watch list including the session on "Guidelines for the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Genealogy in 2026".

Free or not to free

Have you ever heard the saying, "If something is free, you're the product"? You innately know that's true. That's why Facebook has ads and listens to your conversations (which is a super-annoying invasion of privacy I might add). And this is why you can pay for ad-free YouTube. Well things are no different with "free" Artificial Intelligence (AI) apps. Instead of shoving ads in your face, you are the bug in their jar. What you input into AI is used to train the AI - you become the training data. It's the price you pay for using their products for "free". However,  even some of the subscription based apps still use your data for training but at least you might be able to opt out of it like with ChatGPT. Same with the paid versions of Google Gemini. So if you are using AI to process personal data, like family trees, DNA results, etc. then be sure to remove all data on living persons so it doesn't end up in the training data. The Coalition for the Responsible AI in Genealogy (CRAIGEN.org) provides a good principle to follow for this: "AI usage can lead to unintended data exposure, putting private information at risk of being publicly disclosed. Therefore, members of the genealogical community take reasonable measures to safeguard private information when using AI." One more thing to mention on the topic of training data: if you are following this blog, I wrote yesterday about how the data that AI produces is from a compendium of all human knowledge. Most of that human knowledge is gained from the AI companies sending out bots to scrape the information from websites. While these would seem harmless if the data is publicly available (unlike Perplexity sending their bots behind paywalls), it does create a huge load on a site's servers. This is why you are seeing such an increase in "Verifying You're Human" captchas. The scraping bots were overloading our server on the International Society of Genetic Genealogy (ISOGG) so we had to implement one of those captchas. The captchas are annoying (but not as annoying as Facebook spying) but at least you now know why we have seen such an increase in use. So go easy on sites that implement those, we should not have to pay a server more for information we provide for free just so an AI company can turn around and charge for it as data they provide!

By the way, I gave ChatGPT 5.2 free license (very little prompting) to create this graphic - pretty good I'd say!

AI's impact on art and trust

AI struggles with hands. 
Microsoft Co-Pilot April 2025

One of the biggest ironies of generating something with AI, whether it is a picture, writing, animation, etc. is that the work the AI generates is considered "original". The irony about this is that AI draws from the compendium of all human knowledge and creation; it could not write if a human had not written it. It cannot create a picture if a human did not already create it. AI needs human knowledge and creation to create it's "original" works. So what is AI's impact on artwork? A local family friend, who works as a graphic artist, called yesterday and said he can't find work. He's told he's over-qualified, or too old (they don't say that but a lot of employers do discriminate based on age. Why hire a qualified Gen-X when you can hire a Gen-Z for less?) and the end reason for it all is that AI is taking his work. Again, a Zoomer can do similar or close to what he did for less. And this graphic artist has had some of his artwork go nationwide on products you have seen; and now AI has dried up that work. I was telling another friend today about his plight and she replied, "I hate AI art! That's all there is on social media and I'm sick of it!"

I have a couple of predictions that will be good for our graphic artist friend and for all artists - I think that there will come a market saturation point where because AI art is so mass-produced and everywhere right now, that two things will happen (eventually): 1. Human created art will be in demand again 2. Human created art will go up in value. Hopefully, he can ride this out because think about all the fields this is impacting. Acting is an art and there is now an AI actress. How do human actors feel about competing with code for paychecks? Can an AI actor win an Oscar for Best Actor? Or would an AI win for Best Graphics? 

Something else to consider is trust. How can we know something wasn't created with AI? The AI detectors marketed to teachers can be faulty. A cousin wrote a college entrance essay and did not use AI at all and the AI detector said she did. When we began working on our photo recommendations for the Coalition of Responsible Use in Genealogy (CRAIGEN.org) I heard Steve Little say something that has stuck with me since, "It will be hard to trust online family tree photos added after November 2022." This is why CRAIGEN advocates for labeling images created with AI. Most people just starting out with AI do not realize that AI does not restore a photo, it regenerates a photo. And since AI is programmed to correct things, it does ever-so-slightly. AI might straighten out a bump in their nose, the lines of in their ears, upturn the corner of their mouth, straighten their tie, etc. Sometimes the changes are glaringly noticeable like changing the color of a coat and other times, you cannot detect any changes. Technically, it is not a photo of your ancestor it has generated, it is AI's interpretation. This is why it is so important to label AI generated photos.