Thrifty Token Tree Tips

Now that I have become a Claude convert, I decided to learn about the models and usage so I don't end up torching cash like Amazon did. Granted, I would run out of cash much faster than Amazon, but still. Hitting usage limits is super annoying! Found this GREAT article with all kinds of tips like "Chat uses less tokens than Co-work" and when you are working on something, Claude will re-read everything all over again which uses more tokens so you can save tokens on a Co-work session just by using this prompt suggested by Ruben Hassid:

"At the end of a Cowork session, prompt “Write a session-notes.md with the key decisions and next steps.” Next session, start with “Read session-notes.md first.”

As so often happens with technology, some of the tips Ruben provided four months ago in April 2026 are already out-of-date due to changes made by Claude. Like, I tried to change the setting to "concise" but it's gone. Yes, I know it partly moved to "Customize->Skills" but "Concise" would need to be manually added.The next burning million-dollar, er...I mean million-token question is which model do I use for what? Ruben gives this advice:

"Grammar checks, brainstorming, reformatting, short answers. Sonnet handles all of this at a fraction of the cost.

Opus + Extended thinking is your heavy machinery. Don’t use heavy machinery to move a chair.

My rule: if the task takes Claude less than 30 seconds to answer, it probably doesn’t need Opus. Switch models before you start the session. It takes 2 clicks."

Remember, his post was written before Fable launched so put Fable under the "complex task" and "token-torching" category in your grey matter.

And speaking of token-torching, I tried out Ruben's tips for NOT uploading images to Claude and torching my tokens that way - I have figured out a way that I could obtain the info I needed for Claude -AND- save tokens in the process. The two apps I used for this were FamilySearch and

the "Notes" app that comes standard in my iPhone. I regularly use the Notes app for voice transcription because it's pretty good. To do this test run, I first opened my FamilySearch tree to Adam Weaver where I know I have saved several pages of a Weaver book in the sources section of Adam's profile. The book is almost 100 pages and as I recently hit that 100 page limit in another chat, I have been thinking about capturing the information in this book without hitting that limit. So here's how I accomplished that and the first test run did not even change my usage percentages! Woo-hoo! Open FamilySearch on your phone, find the image of a source you want to save, click the "copy" icon on the transcription (circled in red in the left screenshot), then paste that into a new note on your phone. Caveat, I was copying and pasting a typed transcription so FamilySearch's transcription had little to no errors. If you are copying transcribed handwriting, there will likely be a higher error rate. I copy and pasted three transcriptions into the Note and then clicked "Select All" in the Note and then pasted that into Claude. I included the prompt in this image and it put the pasted text above my prompt but it still worked like a charm. 

I also have a TON of books and other genealogical resources I have imaged with my phone. So I tried an experiment and searched for "Adam" in my photos, found a page from the same Weaver book, held my finger down on it and pressed down until "Select all" came up, Copy, and then
pasted into the Sonnet 5 chat. It updated with the additional information just fine but as Ruben

points out, it uses more tokens when Claude has to keep re-reading through previous chats. It does also work to just copy and paste the text into the iPhone note, which to reiterate, saves usage over just constantly updating the chat.

Anyhow, between Ruben's tips (I recommend reading his whole post) and my tweaks for genealogy, I hope this saves you some tokens. Don't forget to proof the work for accuracy.

Fable 5 has me over a barrel

I'm sure Anthropic will like the title of this post as that's exactly what they want! I am a ChatGPT subscriber and wasn't much of a Claude user until Fable 5. I heard the glowing reviews both on podcasts and in the Genealogy and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Facebook group which is what prompted me to try it. 

Before Fable 5, I had a hard time fathoming all the media articles predicting our impending doom from AI. The AI models that we mere mortals have had access to has been dumbed down for us non-Silicon Valley Titans. Until Fable 5. 

I started using Fable 5 after the second trial extension was announced, got halfway through a project, and ran out of credits. (!!!) Which of course, forced me over the barrel to subscribe. I have since learned how to check my usage which I regularly do on the iPhone app while uploading documents on the PC. Here's how to check usage on the phone app: Open Claude, click the three lines in the upper left corner, then click the circle that probably has your initials in the lower left corner, then click "Usage". I do this after each document I add or large task on Fable. I don't do this as much for Sonnet 5, which I change to when doing lighter tasks so as not to use up so many credits. Steve Little recommends Opus 5 and says it's almost as good as Fable 5.

So just what exactly have I've been using Fable 5 for? Document transcription for one. Best output I have seen from an LLM yet! I also use it for compiling biographies on ancestors and even triangulating where my ancestors lived by uploading deeds, land plats, and modern maps.

There are a few drawbacks you should know about besides burning through credits: unlike ChatGPT, Fable (aka Claude) does not reference previous chats. While ChatGPT gets to know you across all of your chats, Claude gets amnesia outside of the chat and you have to start all over again. And speaking of "starting all over again" the absolute worst limitation is the 100 images per chat! I was stunted by this while building a biographical genealogical masterpiece! Made me very grumpy and I left Anthropic some very terse feedback about that. The catch-22 about this is because AI bots have driven up server costs for so many websites, those sites have had to institute "are you human captchas?". So obviously, Claude cannot access a LOT of sites so that means you have to do the accessing and downloading, and then upload it to Claude. 

So far though, Fable 5 has been worth every red credit! For instance, I found an 18th century Westmoreland County, Virginia voters' poll using FamilySearch Full Text for the House of Burgesses. My ancestor, Adam Weaver, cast two votes and both were marked "Obj". Fable 5 explained that meant the opponent of whom he voted for objected to Adam voting because he wasn't a landowner. I don't know how long it would have taken me to learn that on my own if Fable 5 had not pointed it out. It took me two days of uploading documents for yesterday's 18-page biography; but can you imagine how long it would have taken before AI?

Are we really looking into the eyes of that Pompeii victim?

In today's news, the Pompeii Archaeological Park in collaboration with the University of Padua announced an AI "reconstruction" of a Pompeii victim from Mount Vesuvius' AD 79 eruption. While artificial intelligence can be a more cost-effective and quicker way to do facial reconstructions than clay models, it is hoped that prompters will do every possible measure to insure their interpretation from remains is not altered or improved upon by an AI. Processes and tools should be peer-reviewed and published in academic journals. If you find that this particular case has indeed been published in a peer-reviewed journal, please share the link in the comments section below. While genealogists have photos that can be regenerated, photos produced with AI should always be disclosed and labeled. See the Coalition for Responsible AI in Genealogy's photo statement for more information.

FamilySearch does it again with "Simple Search"!

 As FamilySearch's biggest (self-proclaimed) fan, they have once again created an AI search tool that is a "must try" for genealogists! I learned about Simple Search from Jennifer Moulder at the 2026 Utah State DAR Conference. I thought I would try it out with searching for a document for my own Chapter Registrar; that she needed for a Prospective Member's application. To use the tool, sign in to your FamilySearch account, or if you do not have one, you need to create one to use the Labs feature. I then located the "Demasters" family that my Registrar needed a document for that tied the father to the son, and as you can see in the image, I just asked it to search for that using their FamilySearch ID numbers. It produced a list of documents within seconds, including one my Registrar could use, and she was quite pleased! Jennifer also mentioned that Simple Search will sometimes produce documents that Full Text misses.

To edit or not to edit? Disclosure is the answer

Salt Palace 2026

In today's news, the prompter and motion capture provider of AI creation, Tilly Norwood, is receiving death threats. An interesting point the prompter makes is that "Tilly is famous. I'm not. That's wonderful. Fame is a horrible thing." Death threats definitely add credence to the "fame is a horrible thing" posit. Norwood's prompter also makes the point that since the AI is the famous one, she doesn't have to do things like Botox to preserve youthfulness. Altering one's appearance was a recent discussion I had with Ilya at The Family Vault (an AI Agent and cloud storage) booth at 2026 RootsTech. Ilya questioned why disclose using AI for photo regeneration when people edit photos with Photoshop or even that many women wear make-up and that's editing their looks? I've been mulling this over ever since RootsTech! In the Genealogy Community, it is actually an asset to be older. When I became active in genealogy at age 31, I actually had genealogists be dismissive towards me due to my youth. Some genealogists wear make-up and some don't; it's not a field where appearance is judged like it is with celebrities. I have noticed that make-up tends to help when on Zoom meetings or on stage because the bright lights tend to wash out facial features. Unlike with AI use, there's no need to disclose I'm wearing make-up because it's quite obvious and visible. Of course I didn't think of this at the time I was chatting with Ilya - the case for disclosure lies with whether editing can be detected or not. Make-up is visible. Tinting old photos is visible. AI photo regeneration is not visible (at least to the naked eye). Read more here on the Coalition for Responsible AI in Genealogy's "Protecting Trust in Historical Images" position statement.

"The Thinking Game" is a must watch for AI and Genetic Genealogy enthusiasts

https://youtu.be/d95J8yzvjbQ?si=mrHOHVrLm41B9Bre
 

The COVID-19 pandemic brought into sharp focus for me how precious time really is. You cannot buy more time no matter how wealthy you are; so at some point, you need to realize this fact and spend the time you have as wisely as you can. One area where I feel strongly about this is with movies and TV. I'm always telling my friends, "You won't be on your death bed saying, "I wish I had watched more news." I especially detest watching movies or shows that I feel were a waste of my time and grey matter. Due to my mind-shift, I struggle to find something worth watching during air travel. On a recent United flight, I was lucky to find "The Thinking Game" in their library. Definitely worth every second of my time to watch! The film centers on the journey of Demis Hassabis, from childhood through to winning the Nobel Prize for creating the AI AlphaFold agent which solved the "protein-folding problem". Not only does the documentary include much of the evolution of artificial intelligence and the issues surrounding it, it also shows how Hassabis had the goal from a young age that AI could be used to solve human issues and ailments. "The Thinking Game" is available to watch on Prime and for free on YouTube.

No copyrighting AI generated art

 On Monday, February 23, 2026, I wrote about artificial intelligence’s impact on human created art and how I think the onslaught of AI art slop will eventually drive people back to human created art. Well…that prediction is

already coming true; on March 1st, a local friend posted on Facebook looking for a graphic artist that did NOT use AI. Another win for human created art occurred today when the Supreme Court rejected a case of man seeking to copyright AI generated art. This rejection upholds a lower court ruling that denied the copyright. AI art will continue to improve and be used en masse, but there’s still value in human created art which will continue to grow.